Saturday, February 21, 2009

Beyond the Sea




Somewhere beyond the sea
somewhere waiting for me
my lover stands on golden sands
and watches the ships that go sailin

Somewhere beyond the sea
she's there watching for me
If I could fly like birds on high
then straight to her arms
I'd go sailin'

It's far beyond the stars
it's near beyond the moon
I know beyond a doubt
my heart will lead me there soon

We'll meet beyond the shore
we'll kiss just as before
Happy we'll be beyond the sea
and never again I'll go sailin'

I know beyond a doubt
my heart will lead me there soon
We'll meet (I know we'll meet) beyond the shore
We'll kiss just as before
Happy we'll be beyond the sea
and never again I'll go sailin'

no more sailin'
so long sailin'
bye bye sailin'...
move on out captain

Of Uselessness and Emptiness

I wanted to write an emotion-binding poem or essay but I could not. It occured to me that my thoughts just does not seem to be in order. Come to think of it, I have been for always warned that I follow my emotions too much.

I really wish I could write an essay that will be copied by a lot of people and send it to their loved ones. I really wish that I could write a poem that would be the cause of an interminable chain message. But, alas, I am a political science student who knows how to report, make rhetorics, and such but not honed to write a tearjerker.

No wonder why my emotions find no outlet. I could not write and let these emotions flow. It would be easy to say that when you write, passions flow from your heart to the hands. I can imagine that. But have it done? Let's talk about population control.

A Mirror of the Rain (stolen from Inday)

What good is the truth when you have a good story? What good is reality when you can have a much colorful and pleasing version of it? What can you possibly get from knowing something unimportant to anyone? What good is the truth when it only serves as a constant reminder of what ifs and of silent rejection?

Nothing.

It is of no value. It is a totally useless possession that only occupies our souls. It is a parasite that chooses to comfortably settle in us until it has consumed every fiber of our strength. Yet, we treasure it. It is too important to discard. It is too precious to let go of because its roots can never be erased. The wide gap it would create would lead to a permanent space in our identity. And we would be forever torn.

Sometimes we choose to reconstruct it for other’s sake. We add sequins and glitters and papier-mâché adornments, partly to interest others, and partly to convince ourselves. But most of the time, the latter excuse fails.

When we have no one’s attention to get, when we have no audience to mind, the sequins slowly peel off, and the bemusing glitters dust away, and the papier-mâché adornments collapse, and we are left with nothing but a vast silence and the frail beauty of the truth.

We might even try to avoid it and hide from it. We might try to forget it. But usually, we can never manage to do so.

In our solitary dreams, it finds us; its filthy and unwelcoming presence reaches out to us, and we scream a blood curdling scream but no one hears us. Then we wake up, in the brooding stillness of the night when we could not see ourselves, or in the middle of broad daylight, when the sun hurriedly blinds us, and we cry of helplessness and fear.

The inevitable has dawned upon me. And I had no choice but to embrace the monstrosity of truth’s beauty….

The sun was bidding its last farewells to an austere horizon. My face caught a breeze; a lonesome harmony of a lost song came with it. It was ethereal, and it rang in my ear for a moment, or for an eternity.

On my lap, sat my hands, they were cupped against each other, as though protecting a delicate being from being corrupted by a harsh impending reality. I was wearing a garish dress; embedded with sparkling beads of unknown histories - like the story I created to turn my torment into artificial solace.

Several moments passed and I was still looking out into the horizon, now a deep azure almost ruled the horizon. The corner which contained me was already dimming with the sky. And I was still waiting for you.

A gentle rapping came all of a sudden, and it dominated the atmosphere. It was almost illusory, like someone walking on air. But it was building its presence with every daring dive it took. And so a perfect cadence resonated throughout the space.

But in the steady tempo of the rain, a different beat echoed. It was gaining depth with every sound, much like the rain, but stronger. It was approaching the semi-darkness of my existence. And, it was coming for me, the way I have longed for it to.

But I never expected that the bare naked truth would come with it.

The rhythm, your footsteps, halted. And I looked up to meet your face. There was no room for doubt in your expression. Then, you extended your touch towards me, willing for my hand’s embrace to break and join with yours. I have dreamt for it to happen.
Trying my best from cowering, I broke my hand’s union and entwined them with yours. I stood up, and you led me to the perfect clearing, to my dream and to my despair.

The perfect cadence of the rain dance gradually turned into a sweet-scented melody. You gingerly laid my hands to your shoulders, and gently pressed yours against my hips. Then, we drew circles onto the marble floor, so free in form, yet it so perfect in time.

It was like the movies, which I often treat with disdain. It was the part where the lovers turn to more than lovers and when they seem to soar into an unearthly trance. But, that was an acceptable exception; it was the only slow-motion romantic film, which I never anticipated to see the end credits.

I inhaled the perfume of the night to save myself from being saved. The air was a fusion of cinnamon and of an unrelenting coolness of a cloud. I took in as much air as I could with every breath, still, I felt so restricted, my blood pounding cautiously in my veins. Your touch was a whisper to my skin, reverberating in my soul, and sending ripples throughout my being.

My head turned feathery light; it felt like it was going to drift apart with the no recollections of definition. The only imagery in my mind was that of you, and the slow romantic film that I never wanted to end.

Then, the sequins began to peel off, and the glitters began to dust away, and the papier-mâché adornments were collapsing. And I was still there drawing circles on the marble floor with you. I did not flinch nor fidget, I simply found myself dumbfounded. The wind rushed to the minute void between us. And as it did, it delivered a careless whisper, soft yet undeniably audible. The unexpected package contained the truth. The truth contained three words.

I love you.

It was pristine. It was clear. It was bare. I could not take it back anymore. I could not deny it. I was left with no choice but to embrace it. And I did.
Suddenly, I felt so vibrant, so tranquil. Was this the haunting that I was trying to escape for so long? Was this the nightmare that I feared of? It was neither, for it was a dream, a long melodic enchantment that was a delicacy of my own.

I wanted to share it to you. I wanted to tell you that I have, at last, accepted my feelings, my weakness. I looked up to meet your gaze. But I did not see your gaze. I did not see your eyes. I did not see your smile.

It was missing.

Your familiar face was undisturbed. And, it mirrored the same blissful state that I was in. I was confused. I looked further to search for your eyes, to search for logic, and I found them, but they were not with me. As we turned again to complete yet another circle, I saw her. They were with a goddess. They were transfixed with her beauty. She was beyond words. Her beauty was quiet yet it was overpowering that it warped me to an elated state. I peered onto your face for the second time. Again, I did not find you. I knew I never will.

A draft filled the void between us – much wider that I thought at first. The void widened. Then, again, the sequins began to peel off, and the glitters began to dust away, and the papier-mâché adornments were collapsing. And a package was delivered. It contained another truth. The truth, again, contained three inevitable words.

You love her.

The sweet-scented melody tuned into pricking cologne, so taunting that my lungs were threatening to die of losing too much blood. The song was a soft whimper to my ears. We were still circling in time with the song, but I was circling down faster and faster alone, until my head was empty again, gasping for recollections of anything except you, your eyeless face, and the slow romantic film that I wanted to end.

I yearned for the song to stop, to save myself from crashing entirely to the ground.

This was the truth I was escaping. This was the truth that I have turned to stories. This was my haunting. This was my nightmare. This was the end.

The sweet-scented melody twisted to a perfect cadence of a newborn rain. This time, it was piercing through the stillness of insanity.

And I was faced with two truths. I had to accept both of them or the other would be futile. I had to. I chose to.

I swallowed the bitter-tasting potion of that night. I inhaled the piercing breeze of the rain. I listened to the anguished song inside my soul, and it played over and over again.

The rain must end, as the sun must lose. The lyrics soon ran out. The notes soon faded. And we stopped drawing circles on the marble floor. We parted with a void so vast. And the warm embrace was soon forgotten.

The clearing, my dream and my despair, was soon part of the second ago.

It was the truth of my dream that completed me. It was the truth of my despair that broke me. But, they were two different truths. They were two different faces. And I could not have had one without the other. No one could have the sun without the moon and life without death.

I would never be the same anymore, because those two truths are forever part of my identity. I should have seen it coming, but it was inevitable, as everything is.

I would never forget that night, when I drew circles on a marble floor, when I watched the rain turn to song and the song turn to rain. I would never forget that night when I have loved and let go.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Understanding Nationalism: From an Economical, Political, and Psychological Perspective

Nationalism is unquestionably one of the most important concepts of this century. It has proven to be more powerful than any other creed. Great empires have broken down under its assault; wars and revolutions have been started in the name of nationality that has changed the face of the world (Doob, 1; Hertz, 1).
Immense controversy surrounds the political character of nationalism. On one hand, nationalism can appear to be a progressive and liberating force, offering the prospect of national unity or independence. On the other, it can be an irrational and reactionary creed that allows political leaders to conduct policies of military expansion and war in the name of the nation (Heywood, 2007).
German dictator Adolf Hitler is a nationalist, in terms of nation as Aryans. Mongol emperor Genghis Khan used nationalism to mobilize the entire Mongol empire as a ravaging war machine. These are examples of nationalism used to create a powerful conquering army.
But only a few people would declare nationalism as a concept to be killed (Doob, 1). The concept has to be understood in its fundamental senses: psychological, economical, and political. It cannot be properly understood from a single point of view (Carr et al, 1).
Nationalists see the economy as a way to increase the power and prestige of a nation (Hertz, 1944). This paper there does not need to distinguish the two, but this is to be understood if we are to separate patriotism from nationalism. Patriots do not see the national economy as a means to articulate political demands (Heywood, 2007). This regard of the nation also explains the controversy hovering nationalism.
Economic nationalism is conventionally understood to be guided by doctrines such as national self-determination, protectionism, and import substitutions. Generally defined, nationalism is a conscious desire to forward the strength, liberty, or prosperity of a nation by individuals or groups who recognize that they are members of that nation (Carr et al, xviii). Nationalism in economics, however, is taken to a higher perspective. The narrowest construction of economic nationalism is that it refers to a set of policies that give priority to domestic capitalists over foreign investors (Glassman, 41). It promotes economic isolation where everything is done to ensure that a nation is independent of another nation’s economy such as tariffs, import-export regulation, and any other foreign exploitation of local resources. These are done, purportedly, to advance the prosperity of the nation.
It is a widely debatable economic strategy where both sides, economic liberalism and economic protectionism, claim to be gaining strength. Renowned economist and Nobel Peace Prize Winner Paul Krugman commented on economic nationalism: “If there were an Economist’s Creed, it would surely contain the affirmations 'I believe in the Principle of Comparative Advantage' and 'I believe in Free Trade'." However, Felipe C. Balingit suggests a different stand: “Love of simple life is love of country. Simple living is simple economy, and simple economy is tantamount to economic protectionism (160).” President Manuel L. Quezon also understood serving the country toward a progressive economy in a rather unlikely sense: “Ang Amerika ang siyang dapat kilalaning tunay na kaibigan ng Bayang Filipino at ang pulitikang dapat nating pairalin ay ang huwag makipag-alit sa bayang Amerikano (The Filipino Nation should recognize America as its true friend and the policies we must implement should not anger the American Nation) (160).”
The economic nationalism debate is fundamentally important for it continues to distort the characteristics of nationalism. We could see this debate as a struggle to nail nationalism in proper usage. A free-trade economist could claim that by improving foreign affairs, precisely, in export-import relationship, he is forwarding the prosperity of his nation out of dedication to the same nation. But in the same way, an economist of a closed country like North Korea may claim that a true nationalist would keep its economy to itself. Nevertheless, history has shown clearly who won. To use the words of Gerardo P. Sicat, economics professor emeritus of the University of the Philippines—the outcome of that debate had been settled long before it was fought in words.
Politically, nationalism appears as it is, a uniting factor (Abueva, 1967), but like what was first explained, could cause reactionary forces. Its roots can be traced back to the rise of romanticism. Romanticists long for freedom of fancy, emotions, and passions. They first devoted romanticism to the reform of poetry but then also directed it against the conventions of society, and lastly extended it to politics. Romanticism that begun as a revolutionary creed is now a conserving and even a reactionary force (Hertz, 353).
As Plato forewarned, passions should be subjected to reason. But romanticism blurred the relationship. A deep love for a nation is often unceremoniously rationalized. A mere emotional outcry is justified by a disillusionment of reason (Hertz, 354). Any kind of nationalism comprise elements of rationality and emotion, popular nationalism tends to be comprised of a greater component of emotion (Chan and Bridges, 129).
This conflict also arises because of the debate to clearly define nationalism’s role in politics. An imperialist nation may claim to be acting out of nationalism; previous examples had been made. A thoroughly reserved nation could also claim nationalism in the same way. In some extent, a goal of nationalism, specifically, that of the discovery and assertion of a nation’s cultural identity in a competitive world (Abueva, 50) may have contributed. Perhaps, the best way to politically understand nationalism is by looking at its action within the country.
Nationalism always foremost seeks to establish among the citizens a full realization of their political independence. This is fostered by giving them greater participation in their national and local governments as voters and as beneficiaries of the government (Abueva, 50-57). These concrete layouts stem fundamentally from a scenario where nationalism is best pursued.
Jose Ma. Sison identifies the conditions for the pursuit of nationalism: “nationalism is best pursued where the nationalist enjoys civil liberties to the fullest extent.” Sison defines civil liberties, as basically, the rights of expression and liberty (50).
Where the citizens have these civil liberties they could make demands. Where there are more or less uniform demands, which people in a society share; which arises from their nationalism; for which justifications exist and can be readily expressed; which incline them to make personal sacrifices in behalf of their government’s aims; and which may or may not lead to appropriate action (Doob, 6).
Sison suggested that any arising action out of such demands could lead to a nationalist movement. The civil liberties of a citizen of a nation are of such grave condition for nationalism, which is why these basic rights are among the fundamentals of a state, especially democratic ones, where accountability, especially in policy-making is held in high esteem. The impact of nationalism on public policy remains considerable despite any corruption and wastefulness that could attend policy implementation (Abueva, 50-57). That is how pervasive the spirit of nationalism is, proving its indispensability when it comes to running a nation.
The conflicts that arise out of political nationalism are, at best, yet again, a mere false allusion to nationalism. Nationalism is not aggression—nationalism is self-respect, and those who best respected themselves were the very best people to respect others (Hertz, 2).
When talking about perceptions and large scale devotion to the country, psychology cannot be left out of the picture. Nationalism and how it arises is of particular interest to psychologists. They have provided some explanations on how a sense of nationalism is established. Leonard W. Doob, in his book, Patriotism and Nationalism: Their Psychological Foundations, provided a concise track of nationalism starting from its “ingredients” to its “facilitation” and possible “internationalism.”
As far as a state aspiring to establish nationalism may be concerned, psychology has provided for us a means of inculcating the doctrines of nationalism. It has done so by first exposing the roots of nationalism—it is deeply rooted in people (Doob, 28). As such, the means of establishing nationalism has to arise from the people, ideally, a certain individual who epitomizes self-sacrifice out of the love for country—a hero, in short.
But is nationalism, after all the discussion, a virtue worth pursuing? Like what was earlier stated, the battle has been decided long before it began. There just appeared to be a misuse of the loosely defined concept. Aggression and conservation has been associated with the ideal of nationalism that created a web of debates particularly in its political and economic aspect.
As a conclusion, I would quote from Reynaldo Silvestre: “Filipino nationalism has progressed […] wherein […] it need not have an enemy around. It is now, therefore, but the expression of national purposiveness dependent on national resources of men and material to carry us forward to our desired goal (57)”

Sunday, February 1, 2009

The Doubtful

Old women sang the hymns as the stereotype of society assumes confirmation. Monotonous chants reverberated the cold halls. The knees dragged on. The old women looked at the familiar archway face.
He cocked his head reluctantly. The tattoos in his neck stretched. His scar under his left eye was ominous. It was shaped like a cross.
A cross. A very vivid cross. As vivid as the cross hanging from his rosary beads.
All stopped suddenly. A crack from a nearby forest was heard. He took a step forward.

The Ironic

What job lay in front. The toil seemed incessant. Nevertheless, now she could rest. Folding her sleeves to her elbows, she looked up in the sun and the deeper her face scars seemed to be.
A call resounded. She heaved a sigh and went to pick up the axe with which she hacked the great Virility Tree day after day for a month now. The fruits of her labor were unsightly muscles on her part and a relatively small dent on the tree. But the damage is slowly taking place.
She smiled at it.